As I explore the interactive thread of my project I have realised that a thing that is truly interactive is inherently dynamic. It is an open system. In order for a piece of architecture to be dynamic it needs input energy – potential energy. This line of thought brought me to the discovery of hydraulic accumulators and in particular Grimsby Tower.
(from wikipedia)
“Grimsby Dock Tower is a hydraulic accumulator tower and a famous maritime landmark in Grimsby, North East Lincolnshire, England. It was completed on 27 March 1852 with the purpose of containing a 30,000 UK gallon (136 m³) hydraulic wrought iron reservoir at a height of 200 feet (61 m), to provide hydraulic power (rather than a supply of water) to the lock gates and cranes of Grimsby Docks.[1] The extreme height of the tower was necessary to achieve sufficient pressure. Water towers for water supply purposes don’t need anything approaching this height.”
As I discussed this with one of my profs I realised that there was a prairie model for the use of infrastructure as monument – as a component of identity. The water towers of southern Manitoba are distinct landmarks – what Christian Norberg-Schulz is refering to, I believe, when he talks about the silhouette and its role in our ability to orient in space and identify our surroundings. I believe the case can be made that these structures have actually served their communities not only as infrastructure but as distinct components of regional identity. I believe that Canada is a distinct patchwork of regional identities and the water tower is as much a part of the regional language as is the grain elevator.
Here is a map I am working on showing the spread of existing water towers across southern Manitoba – if you’re from this part of the world it’s amazing how quickly you can locate yourself in your mind just by seeing the images of these towers. As per usual – work in progress. Stay tuned for more layers of information on this puppy.